Розробка OWL-онтології для представлення концептуальних знань в правовій області на прикладі судових справ

Authors

  • K.O. Khala Міжнародний науково-навчальний центр інформаційних технологій і систем НАН та МОН України

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32919/10.32919/uesit.2016.02.51-55

Keywords:

legal ontologyl, egal reasoning, OWL, case based reasoning (CBR), knowledge acquisition system, Protege ontology editor

Abstract

The article is described the legal OWL ontology which does obvious conceptual knowledge in the domain of lawsuit is described, supports reasoning on domain, and can be used for annotation of the text of lawsuit which in turn can be used for replenishment of ontology. The filled ontology can be used for the information search, extraction and case based reasoning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 154 / PDF downloads: 141

References

Hoekstra, R., Breuker, J., Bello, M. D., Boer, A., Lkif core: Principled ontology development for the legal domain. / Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web. Vol. 188 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, 2009. pp. 21–52.

Guarino, N., Welty, C. A., An Overview of OntoClean / Staab, S., Studer, R. / Handbook on Ontologies. Springer Verlag, 2004, pp. 201–220

Ashley, K. D., Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. / ICAIL ’09: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2009, pp. 1–10.

Gangemi, A., Trends in Legal Knowledge: The Semantic Web and the Regulation of Electronic Social Systems / European Press Academic Publishing, 2007, pp. 171–191.

Peters, W., Sagri, M.-T., Tiscornia, D., The structuring of legal knowledge in LOIS. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2), 2007, pp. 117–135.

Walton, D., Legal Argumentation and Evidence / The Pennsylvannia State University Press. 2002, pp. 19–46.

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Khala, K. (2016). Розробка OWL-онтології для представлення концептуальних знань в правовій області на прикладі судових справ. Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology, 4(2), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.32919/10.32919/uesit.2016.02.51-55