Розробка OWL-онтології для представлення концептуальних знань в правовій області на прикладі судових справ
The article is described the legal OWL ontology which does obvious conceptual knowledge in the domain of lawsuit is described, supports reasoning on domain, and can be used for annotation of the text of lawsuit which in turn can be used for replenishment of ontology. The filled ontology can be used for the information search, extraction and case based reasoning.
Guarino, N., Welty, C. A., An Overview of OntoClean / Staab, S., Studer, R. / Handbook on Ontologies. Springer Verlag, 2004, pp. 201–220
Ashley, K. D., Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. / ICAIL ’09: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2009, pp. 1–10.
Gangemi, A., Trends in Legal Knowledge: The Semantic Web and the Regulation of Electronic Social Systems / European Press Academic Publishing, 2007, pp. 171–191.
Peters, W., Sagri, M.-T., Tiscornia, D., The structuring of legal knowledge in LOIS. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2), 2007, pp. 117–135.
Walton, D., Legal Argumentation and Evidence / The Pennsylvannia State University Press. 2002, pp. 19–46.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.