The characteristics and philosophical foundations of the learner-centered paradigm of education




the learner-centred paradigm, J. Dewey, P. Freire, M. Lipman, activity, practice, person, agent


This article has been retracted. Please see: Retraction of published article due to the author's proposal, 2021, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 1-17

Today's educators observe rapid changes in the social institution of education. The paradigmatic approach to education developed by Thomas Kuhn is one strategy that might be used to explain and examine these transitions. According to the study, modern educators follow the learner-centered paradigm. It can, however, appear that the old paradigm is still having an impact on education. Consequently, the article has two primary goals. The first is to compare and contrast the two paradigms of education: learner-centered and teacher-centered. Second, it's crucial to understand what ideas are current in modern philosophy and whether they align with the learner-centered paradigm. The author makes an effort to differentiate philosophical ideas that currently significantly influence worldview. Four-dimensional ontology, constructivist epistemology, the issue of agency, individual identity, and the narrative approach to identity and cognitive concerns are some of them. Through the glasses of the learner-centered paradigm, these ideas are delineated and examined.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 83 / PDF downloads: 43


Abdula, A. (2017). Reason, rationality, subject. Actual Problems of Mind. Philosophy Journal, (17), 193–210. DOI: DOI:

Atkins, K. (2008). Narrative Identity and Moral Identity: A Practical Perspective. New York: Routledge. DOI:

Barr, R. B. & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning – a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 12–25. DOI: DOI:

Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (2003). The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education. Maiden; Oxford; Melbourne; Berlin: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI: DOI:

Blass, E. (2018). White paper: a 21st century education paradigm. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 5(3), 128–133. DOI: DOI:

Bodinet, J. C. (2016). Pedagogies of the futures: Shifting the educational paradigms. European Journal of Futures Research, 4, Art. No. 21. DOI: DOI:

Chiţiba, C. A. (2012). Lifelong learning challenges and opportunities for traditional universities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1943–1947. DOI: DOI:

Collins, A. & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: the digital revolution and the schools. Retrieved from

Cook, J. W. (2019). Learning at the Edge of History. In J. W. Cook (Ed.), Sustainability, Human Well-Being, and the Future of Education (pp. 1-29). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: DOI:

Crowell, S. (1989). A New Way of Thinking: the Challenge of the Future. Educational Leadership, 47(1), 60-63.

Curren, R. (Ed.). (2003). A Companion to the Philosophy of Education. Maiden; Oxford; Melbourne; Berlin: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI:

Dewey, J. (1920). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and Nature. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. DOI:

Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.

Freire, P. (2005a). Education for Critical Consciousness. London; New York: Continuum.

Freire, P. (2005b). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.

Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. New York: Spiegel & Grau.

Hawley, K. (2001). How Things Persist. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Huitt, W. (Ed.). (2018). Becoming a Brilliant Star: Twelve Core Ideas Supporting Holistic Education. La Vergne: IngramSpark.

Huitt, W. (2019, August). Analyzing paradigms used in education and schooling. Educational Psychology Interactive. Atlanta, GA: Author. Retrieved from

Iversen, A.-M. & Pedersen, A. S. (2017). Co-Creating Knowledge: Students and Teachers Together in a Field of Emergence. In T. Chemi, L. Krogh (Eds.), Co-creation in Higher Education: Students and Educators Preparing Creatively and Collaboratively to the Challenge of the Future (pp. 15-30). Rotterdam; Boston; Taipei: Sense Publishers. DOI:

Iversen, A.-M., Pedersen, A. S., Krogh, L., & Jensen, A. A. (2015). Learning, Leading, and Letting Go of Control: Learner-Led Approaches in Education. SAGE Open, 5(4). DOI: DOI:

Jacobs, G. (2014). Towards a New Paradigm in Education: Role of the World University Consortium. Cadmus, 2(2), 116-125.

Kochetkov, M. (2018). The Creative Educational Paradigm. In R. Green, Y. Zhang, I. Rumbal, M. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2018). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 289 (pp. 36-40). Paris: Atlantis Press. DOI: DOI:

Korsgaard, C. M. (1989). Personal Identity and the Unity of Agency: A Kantian Response to Parfit. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 18(2), 101–132. Retrieved from

Korsgaard, C. M. (2009). Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI:

Kozachenko, N. (2017). Critical thinking: the limiting approaches and optimal ways. Actual Problems of Mind. Philosophy Journal, (18), 165–178. DOI: DOI:

Kuhn, T. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI:

Labaree, D. F. (2010). Someone Has to Fail: the Zero-Sum Game of Public Schooling. Massachusetts, London: (Harvard University Press.

Lewis, D. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education, 2nd edn. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo.

Loomis, S. R., Rodriguez, J. P., & Lewis, C. S. (2009). A Philosophy of Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Macintyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 3rd edn. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Olson, E. T. (2003). Personal Identity. In S. P. Stich, T. A. Warfield (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind (pp. 352-368). Maiden; Oxford; Melbourne; Berlin: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI:

Pring, R. (2005). Philosophy of Education: Aim, Theory, Common Sense, and Research. London; New York: Continuum.

Robinson, K. (2001). Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.

Rovane, C. (1998). The Bounds of Agency: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI:

Schechtman, M. (2014). Staying Alive: Personal Identity, Practical Concerns, and the Unity of a Life. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI:

Siegel, H. (1980). Critical thinking as an educational ideal. Educational Forum, 45(1), 7–23). DOI: DOI:

Terziev, V. (2019). Lifelong learning: the new educational paradigm for sustainable development. International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences (IJASOS), 5(13), 82–98. DOI: DOI:

Watson, S. L. & Reigeluth, C. M. (2008). The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education. Educational Technology, 48(5), 42-48.





How to Cite

Olifer, O. (2021). The characteristics and philosophical foundations of the learner-centered paradigm of education. Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology, 9(3), 1–17.